In its newest transfer agains Hindus, Bangladeshi police have branded the Hindu non secular group ISKCON as a “terrorist group,” alleging that its members are concerned within the current spate of communal violence. This accusation follows a previous sedition cost filed in opposition to Chinmoy Krishna Das, a distinguished ISKCON preacher, intensifying scrutiny and stress on Hindu communities in Bangladesh. In at the moment’s DNA, Zee Information takes you thru the surprising growth:
Watch Full DNA Episode Right here
चुनावी वार-पलटवार, हैवीवेट्स का ‘जुबानी प्रहार’
संघ का Mega Plan, एकजुट हो जाएं भाईजान
हिंदू त्योहारों पर हमले, संयोग है या प्रयोग है ?देखिए #DNA LIVE Anant Tyagi के साथ#ZeeLive #ZeeNews #Elections #UPNews #MaharashtraElections | @Anant_Tyagii https://t.co/wdwaHFDeyT
— Zee Information (@ZeeNews) November 13, 2024
Whereas the Supreme Court docket in India has taken measures to limit controversial practices like bulldozing, there appears to be no restrict to the anti-Hindu sentiment festering throughout the border in Bangladesh. What began as extremist teams concentrating on Hindu minorities has now escalated, with the federal government and its regulation enforcement companies brazenly accusing Hindu organizations of terrorism.
Many view these allegations as hole makes an attempt by the administration below Mohammad Yunus to hyperlink ISKCON’s devotional work to communal violence, making a narrative that would additional isolate the Hindu minority. The Bangladeshi public has typically witnessed ISKCON members serving to throughout crises like floods, fairly than inciting hate or violence. In stark distinction, extremist parts incessantly subject public threats in opposition to Hindus.
Observers query the underlying motives of this crackdown. Some recommend that the Bangladeshi authorities, going through worldwide scrutiny, could also be utilizing these costs to destabilize the nation. Just lately, former U.S. President Donald Trump voiced issues in regards to the security of Bangladeshi Hindus, indicating strained relations with Yunus’s administration. Moreover, Bangladesh’s Awami League has lodged a criticism in opposition to Yunus’s authorities with the Worldwide Legal Court docket (ICC), which may quickly provoke an investigation.
Such worldwide pressures may have severe repercussions. If the ICC probe materializes, it may pave the way in which for vital political shifts in Bangladesh, together with the attainable return of Sheikh Hasina. For Yunus, creating instability via communal pressure is perhaps a way to delay democratic processes, shopping for time to safe his personal place amidst a turbulent political panorama.
