New Delhi: In a scathing assault on Rahul Gandhi, Union Dwelling Minister Amit Shah on Saturday responded to Congress MP’s current declare questioning Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s caste. Talking at an occasion, Shah accused Rahul Gandhi of distorting info and creating unwarranted controversies. “Rahul Gandhi has a coverage, lie publicly and lie time and again. So far as PM Narendra Modi’s caste goes, I doubt the Congress is aware of the distinction between bloc and caste. PM Modi stated he’s an OBC, OBC is bloc not a caste. Perhaps Rahul Gandhi’s lecturers didn’t inform him this. That is extraordinarily unhappy that questions on the Prime Minister’s caste are being requested” Amit Shah stated.
#WATCH | Union Dwelling Minister Amit Shah says “Rahul Gandhi has a coverage, lie publicly and lie time and again. So far as PM Narendra Modi’s caste goes, I doubt the Congress is aware of the distinction between bloc and caste. PM Modi stated he’s an OBC, OBC is a bloc, not a caste. Perhaps… pic.twitter.com/4hTcTH5ywP
— ANI (@ANI) February 10, 2024
Congress Misinterprets Caste: Shah On Rahul’s Claims
Shah refuted Rahul Gandhi’s assertion that PM Modi will not be an OBC by delivery, stating that the Congress appears confused concerning the distinction between bloc and caste. He criticized Gandhi’s behavior of publicly mendacity and emphasised that OBC (Different Backward Class) was a bloc, not a caste.
Historic Perspective: PM Modi’s OBC Recognition
Amit Shah supplied historic context, noting that PM Modi’s OBC neighborhood was listed in 1994 beneath the Congress authorities of Gujarat. He clarified that PM Modi was not in any elected place on the time. Shah highlighted Congress’s position in recommending OBC itemizing to the central authorities in 2000, which was accepted. “Modi ji’s neighborhood (jati) was listed as OBC on July 25, 1994, when the chief minister of Gujarat was Chhabildas Mehta and the get together in energy was Congress. Modi ji had by then not even fought an election, and was largely working for the get together. The state authorities run by Congress listed the neighborhood beneath OBC. In 1994 itself, Congress had made suggestions earlier than the central authorities, which the latter accepted and listed within the 12 months 2000. Even in 2000, Modi ji was nowhere within the authorities, not an MP, MLA, or a sarpanch. Modi ji turned CM of Gujarat in 2001,” Shah added.
Congress Anti-OBC: Shah Highlights PM Modi’s Contributions
Persevering with his assault, Shah accused the Congress of being an anti-OBC get together and counseled PM Modi for giving constitutional recognition to OBC communities. He identified Modi’s institution of an OBC fee and profitable implementation of OBC reservations in central authorities jobs.
Shah additionally dismissed Rahul Gandhi’s argument concerning the proportion of OBC secretaries in central authorities ministries, stating that the majority had been commissioned in the course of the Congress regime. He emphasised the significance of recognizing the OBC background of the Prime Minister.
Ram Lalla Pran Pratishtha Decision: Shah Displays On Historic Day
Shifting gears, Shah spoke concerning the historic decision on Ram Lalla Pran Pratishtha in Parliament. He highlighted the decades-long perception in constructing the Ram Mandir on the revered location and praised the PM’s devotion to making sure the method adhered to the scriptures.
Bharat Ratna Awards: Shah Defends Political Awardees
Addressing criticism of the current Bharat Ratna awards, Shah defended the awardees, citing their vital contributions. He acknowledged Chaudhary Charan Singh’s combat for farmers’ rights, Narasimha Rao’s institutionalization efforts, and Swaminathan’s contributions to the inexperienced revolution.
In a last salvo, Shah criticized the Bharat Ratna awards beneath Congress, suggesting they had been both compelled or bestowed upon relations. He underscored the real contributions of current awardees to the nation’s progress.
In a complete response, Amit Shah dismantled Rahul Gandhi’s claims whereas highlighting the federal government’s achievements and the historic significance of current parliamentary discussions.
