The tragic case of Atul Subhash’s loss of life has created a storm on social media with folks elevating questions in regards to the neutrality of Part 498 which is usually misused. On this case, the lawyer representing Atul’s spouse has made some key disclosures associated to the case. Whereas brushing apart the allegations made by Atul, the lawyer stated that there are a number of boards to strategy if one shouldn’t be glad with the Household Courtroom order.
Chatting with the media, the lawyer revealed that each – the husband and the spouse – had been well-off financially. The lawyer stated that whereas the spouse has a superb wage and works in Delhi, Atul was residing in Bengaluru and was incomes Rs 84,000 per 30 days. The lawyer stated that the household courtroom had ordered him to pay Rs 40,000 per 30 days in upkeep for the minor son. As per studies, Atul was left with Rs 44,000 per 30 days to fend for himself and his household together with the leases in Bengaluru.
सास, बहू और ‘सुसाइड’!
‘कानून’ सताए, तो कौन बचाए?
अतुल चला गया, इंसाफ़ अभी बाकी है!देखिए LIVE @ShobhnaYadava के साथ #ZeeNews #ZeeLive #AIEngineer #AtulSubhash #Jaunpur #MediationCourt #NikitaSinghania #SupremeCourt #JusticeIsDue https://t.co/xJB0bNagYB
— Zee Information (@ZeeNews) December 11, 2024
The lawyer stated that for the reason that spouse is well-settled and has good earnings, the household courtroom didn’t order any upkeep for the estranged spouse. The lawyer added that if Atul was not glad with the courtroom order, he might have approached the upper courts.
Within the wake of the tragic suicide of the Bengaluru tech skilled, Nishant Kr. Srivastava, Advocate-on-Report (AOR), Supreme Courtroom, stated the gruelling, lengthy and slow-moving courts and delayed justice dispensation, mixed with our societal biases, that are extra pronounced in non-metropolitan areas, make the entire technique of litigation/ trial a punishment in itself.
Prison lawyer Advocate Vikas Pahwa referred to as for pressing reforms to curb the misuse of Part 498A, which offers with dowry harassment. Talking on the problem, Pahwa described the case as “very severe” and highlighted how the regulation has been exploited through the years, significantly by disgruntled people trying to extort cash from the husband’s household.
(Discussions on suicides may be triggering for some. However suicides are preventable. In case you are searching for assist, some suicide prevention helpline numbers in India are 011-40769002 from Sanjivini (Delhi-based, 10 am – 5.30 pm) and 044-24640050 from Sneha Basis (Chennai-based, eight am – 10 pm), +91 9999666555 from Vandrevala Basis (Mumbai-based, 24×7).
