A Delhi court docket has summoned widespread YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in a defamation case filed by Mumbai BJP chief Suresh Karamshi Nakhua. This case has sparked vital controversy and public curiosity, significantly given the high-profile nature of each people concerned. Rathee, recognized for his important evaluation of political and social points, is accused of defaming Nakhua in a latest video, resulting in widespread condemnation and debate. Listed below are ten key factors to know the fees towards Dhruv Rathee:
Defamation Case Filed: BJP chief Suresh Karamshi Nakhua filed a defamation swimsuit towards Dhruv Rathee, alleging that Rathee referred to as him a “violent and abusive” troll in one among his YouTube movies.
Controversial Video: On July 7, 2024, Rathee uploaded a video titled “My Reply to Godi YouTubers | Elvish Yadav | Dhruv Rathee” on his YouTube channel. On this video, Rathee allegedly referred to Nakhua as a “violent and abusive troll.”
Summons Issued: District Choose Gunjan Gupta of the Saket Court docket issued a summons to Rathee on July 19, 2024. The court docket additionally issued a discover to Rathee concerning Nakhua’s plea for interim reduction. The following listening to is scheduled for August 6, 2024.
Allegations by Nakhua: Nakhua, a BJP spokesperson in Mumbai, claims that Rathee’s allegations have been made with none “rhyme or purpose.” He asserts that these claims have led to widespread condemnation and mock towards him.
Social Media Tips Violated: The swimsuit argues that Rathee’s video, described as extremely provocative and incendiary, unfold quickly throughout digital platforms, making daring and unsubstantiated claims towards Nakhua. The video allegedly insinuates that Nakhua is linked to violent and abusive troll actions.
Affect on Fame: Nakhua contends that Rathee’s allegations have tarnished his fame and standing in society. He claims that the video has planted seeds of suspicion and distrust, with far-reaching penalties on each his private {and professional} life.
Court docket Order Particulars: The court docket ordered the issuance of summons and see of the applying below Order 39 Rule 1 and a couple of CPC to the defendants, to be served by way of varied modes together with PF & RC/Pace Put up/Accredited Courier, and digital means by August 6, 2024. The method was additionally granted for quick supply, as requested.
Authorized Illustration: Advocates Raghav Awasthi and Mukesh Sharma are representing Suresh Nakhua on this defamation swimsuit.
Demand for Damages: In his plea, Nakhua is searching for Rs 20 lakh in damages from Rathee for the alleged defamation brought on to him in our on-line world.
Claims Towards Different People: In his petition, Nakhua alleges that Rathee’s video falsely claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had hosted “violent and abusive trolls like Ankit Jain, Suresh Nakhua, and Tajinder Bagga” at his official residence, additional intensifying the defamation claims.
