Samajwadi Occasion (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav’s plans to pay tribute to Jayaprakash Narayan on the Jayaprakash Narayan Worldwide Centre (JPNIC) had been foiled by the Uttar Pradesh authorities. The state administration cited safety issues and ongoing building on the web site. In right now’s episode of reports present DNA, Zee Information’ analysed political drama surrounding the information about Akhilesh Yadav’s insistence on paying tribute on the Jay Prakash Narayan Worldwide Centre (JPNIC).
The SP chief was decided to go to JPNIC to honor Narayan’s birthday, however the authorities blocked his entry. The primary entrance was sealed with tin sheds, and barricades had been arrange exterior Yadav’s residence. Yadav questioned the federal government’s motives, saying, “What’s the authorities hiding? Why are they stopping us from paying tribute to an important chief?”
DNA : अखिलेश Vs योगी सरकार..श्रद्धांजलि पर सियासत. जेपी जयंती पर ‘प्योर पॉलिटिक्स’ का DNA टेस्ट
JPNIC जाने की जिद..अखिलेश की पॉलिटिक्स ! जेड प्लस सुरक्षा वाले अखिलेश को कीड़े से खतरा ?#DNA #AkhileshYadav #Lucknow #UttarPradesh #UPNews #JPProtestPolitics @Anant_Tyagii pic.twitter.com/ZJVJ4T8Np6
— Zee Information (@ZeeNews) October 11, 2024
The Lucknow Improvement Authority (LDA) acknowledged that JPNIC was a building web site with potential well being hazards on account of rain and bugs. Nevertheless, critics argue that this was a mere pretext to stop Yadav from turning the occasion right into a political rally.
JPNIC, constructed in the course of the SP regime in 2016 at a value of ₹864 crores, has been a contentious situation. The Yogi Adityanath authorities halted building in 2017, citing corruption allegations. Cupboard Minister Jayveer Singh accused the SP of making an attempt to disrupt peace within the state. “Akhilesh Yadav desires to create unrest,” he stated.
The standoff culminated in Yadav paying tribute to Narayan’s statue exterior his residence. He criticized the federal government, saying, “If they honestly understood Jayaprakash Narayan’s contributions, they would not have stopped us.”
The incident has sparked debate on the politics behind the federal government’s resolution. Will this transfer profit the ruling get together, or has it handed the opposition a rallying cry?
