The Karnataka Excessive Courtroom not too long ago intervened in a peculiar case the place a Bengaluru girl accused her US-based husband of cruelty for allegedly barring her from consuming French fries. Final week, the Courtroom stayed her plea and halted a Look Out Discover (LOC) towards the husband, stopping his return to the US.
Justice M Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, restricted the police from investigating the husband, who’s 36, and criticized the criticism as missing substantial grounds. The case was filed below Sections 498A (home cruelty) and 504 (legal intimidation) of the IPC, alongside the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The girl, 29, had initially reported her husband to the South Ladies police station in Basavanagudi, accusing her husband of dowry harassment.
She claimed that he restricted her weight loss plan to forestall weight achieve following childbirth. The husband countered in courtroom, arguing that he managed all family chores within the US whereas his spouse spent her time watching TV and chatting.
Justice Nagaprasanna remarked that permitting any investigation would misuse the authorized course of and questioned the police’s resolution to problem an LOC over such a minor problem. He famous that the criticism didn’t current a sound case below Part 498A, and criticized using police energy as a method to forestall the husband’s journey.
Justice M Nagaprasanna stated, “Allowing any investigation towards the husband… would turn into an abuse of the method of the legislation and placing a premium on the act of the spouse in alleging that she was not allowed to eat French fries on the related time limit.”
Justice Nagaprasanna additional acknowledged, “The criticism nowhere signifies any ingredient of offence punishable below Part 498A of the IPC even towards the husband.”
The decide additionally expressed shock with the police issuing an LOC in such ‘trivial issues’. “It isn’t use of energy by the police however misuse of energy on the behest of the complainant (girl). There is no such thing as a crime definitely worth the title of issuance of LOC. The one object of the complainant seems to be stopping the petitioner (husband) from touring again to… the USA…” he added.
