NEW DELHI: In a groundbreaking growth, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on Monday offered its complete report following a meticulous 92-day scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complicated. The sealed report, now within the palms of Varanasi district Choose AK Vishvesha, holds pivotal proof concerning the mosque’s origins and its potential connection to a pre-existing Hindu temple.
Hindu Plea For Transparency: Court docket To Determine On Public Disclosure Of ASI Report
Put up the report’s submission, the Hindu facet fervently appealed for its public launch and urged the court docket to supply copies to all concerned events. The court docket has scheduled the subsequent listening to for December 21, the place the destiny of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque dispute will doubtless take a decisive flip.
Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee Seeks Data Amidst Rising Tensions
Concurrently, the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee, chargeable for managing the Gyanvapi Mosque, has filed a petition searching for entry to the survey report. The transfer displays the mounting tensions surrounding the case and the importance hooked up to the findings uncovered through the in depth ASI survey.
ASI Advocate Highlights Essential Proof Pointing To Temple’s Existence
ASI’s advocate, Amit Kumar, addressing reporters, emphasised the invention of compelling proof suggesting the presence of a temple on the website. Kumar underscored the report’s vital function in settling the longstanding dispute between the Hindu and Muslim factions.
It’s noteworthy that the ASI had beforehand requested further time to conclude the survey, with Varanasi District Court docket Choose AK Vishvesh extending the deadline to December 18. The court docket had, on earlier events, granted extensions to the ASI, demonstrating the complexity and significance of the investigation.
Supreme Court docket’s Refusal To Halt ASI Survey
On August 4, the Supreme Court docket refused to halt the ASI’s survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque, aside from the ‘wuzukhana’ space. The ASI, dedicated to preserving the construction, assured the court docket that no excavation would happen on the website, permitting the survey to proceed.
On November 2, the ASI knowledgeable the district court docket of the completion of the survey however requested further time to compile the report, together with particulars of the gear used. The findings and conclusions offered within the sealed report are anticipated to be instrumental in shaping the result of this historic and contentious case.
