Late Friday night time, the Mysuru-Darbhanga Bagmati Categorical collided with a stationary items practice, inflicting 12 coaches to derail and injuring 19 passengers. The incident has prompted a high-level investigation, with the NIA now probing a potential sabotage angle. Preliminary studies point out that the practice was following the right indicators till it shifted from the primary line to the loop line at a pace of 75 kmph.
How The Categorical Prepare Veered Off Most important Line
Officers are wanting into how the categorical practice ended up on a loop line, the place the pace restrict is simply 30 kmph, regardless that it had a inexperienced sign to remain on the primary line. Southern Railway normal supervisor RN Singh stated the motive force adopted the indicators accurately after leaving Chennai. Nevertheless, what conspired simply 40 km off the Chennai station has raised issues.
Based on a report by the Occasions of India, a railway supply stated, “The explanation for the accident may very well be many. A worn-out sign working panel within the station grasp’s room or ongoing sign modification work within the space. However sabotage can’t be dominated out and must be investigated.”
Yet another angle that’s arising prominently is the possiblity of tampering with the out of doors signalling gear andswitch factors at Kavarapettai station. The TOI report additional recommended that bolts and brackets on the swap level have been found loosened, with a number of lacking nuts, sparking suspicions of sabotage.
The accident follows an identical tampering incident reported in September on the close by Ponneri station.
Locomotive Security Specialists’ POV
Specialists are drawing parallels between the incident and the Balasore practice tragedy, whereby the Howrah-bound Coromandel Categorical acquired a inexperienced sign for the primary line, however due to a monitor error, it ended up on a loop line and crashed right into a parked items practice.
Security consultants clarify that in an automatic-signaling system, the sign depends upon how the tracks are set. So, if the sign is inexperienced for the primary line, the tracks ought to routinely modify to maintain the practice on the primary line.
Okay P Arya, a retired chief sign and telecom engineer/data know-how within the Northern Railway advised PTI, it is a well-known subject, although by no means formally admitted, {that a} flaw within the monitor design and interlocking mechanisms can result in derailments like this.
Specialists acknowledged {that a} clear understanding will solely come after an in depth investigation, which is already underway.
(With inputs from PTI)
