The Supreme Court docket’s choice to uphold the validity of the abrogation of Article 370 has drawn a pointy response from the opposition quarters. The opposition leaders not solely expressed disappointment over the decision but in addition stated that their battle would proceed. Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi stated that the legitimisation of the Union Authorities’s choice could have vast penalties.
“There was little doubt that the state is an integral a part of India. However being an integral half doesn’t imply that it didn’t have a definite constitutional relationship with the Union. This constitutional relationship was made everlasting after the dissolution of the constituent meeting of Kashmir,” stated Owaisi on X.
He additional stated that the largest losers of the Union authorities’s Article 370 choice would be the Dogras of Jammu and Buddhists of Ladakh as they should face demographic change.
“In Bommai’s judgement, the Supreme Court docket had stated that federalism is a part of the fundamental construction of the structure. Federalism signifies that the state has its voice and in its space of competence, it has full freedom to function. How is it that Parliament can communicate rather than the Meeting? How is it that Parliament can move a decision that was to be handed by the Meeting within the structure?” stated Owaisi.
The Hyderabad MP additional stated that the style by which 370 was abrogated was a violation of constitutional morality. “Even worse, the abrogation, bifurcation and downgrading of the state to union territory is a grand betrayal of the solemn promise that the Union of India had made to the individuals of Kashmir,” he stated.
#Article370
1. In 2019, the CJI spoke at a seminar and stated that “public deliberation will all the time be a risk to those that achieved energy in its absence.” The query is whether or not you may abrogate the particular standing of a state by placing the entire state in curfew, whereas it’s…
— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) December 11, 2023
He claimed that the decision has given a free hand to make large cities a union territory. “As soon as this has been legitimised, there’s nothing stopping the union govt from making Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad or Mumbai a Union Territory. Let’s have a look at the case of Ladakh, it’s being dominated by Lt. Governor, with no democratic illustration in any respect,” he stated.
On August 5, 2019, the Central authorities introduced the revocation of the particular standing of Jammu and Kashmir granted below Article 370 and break up the area into two union territories.