Within the aftermath of the latest communal violence in Haryana’s Sohna, a stunning incident has emerged involving the homicide of Bajrang Dal chief, Pradeep Sharma. The Aam Aadmi Occasion (AAP) chief, Javed Ahmad, has been accused of orchestrating the assault on Sharma, sparking intense controversies. The AAP has vehemently denied any involvement and as a substitute pointed fingers on the ruling Bharatiya Janata Occasion (BJP), alleging a conspiracy to implicate their chief falsely. Because the investigation unfolds, proof supporting Ahmad’s innocence has been submitted, elevating questions concerning the involvement of different events. The case has added gas to the already tense political local weather within the area.
AAP Chief Javed Ahmad Accused
In reference to the alleged homicide, the Aam Aadmi Occasion (AAP) chief Javed Ahmad has been accused. The AAP, nonetheless, claims that this accusation is a component of a bigger conspiracy orchestrated by the Bharatiya Janata Occasion (BJP).
AAP Alleges BJP’s Involvement
The AAP contends that the BJP’s affect has been rejected by the folks of Haryana, main the BJP to resort to divisive ways. In response to the AAP, the BJP engineers riots after which recordsdata false FIRs towards leaders from different events. The registration of a false FIR towards Javed Ahmad is seen as part of this alleged conspiracy.
Proof Supporting Ahmad’s Innocence
The AAP has offered proof to assist Javed Ahmad’s innocence, displaying that he was greater than 100 kilometers away from the scene of the crime on the time of the incident. Cell location knowledge and video footage have been handed over to the police in assist of this declare.
Demand for a Thorough Investigation
The AAP is totally cooperating with the investigation and urges the police to conduct an intensive inquiry. In addition they query why a big variety of law enforcement officials had been absent through the violence and why the Police Chief was on go away throughout that interval.
CID Data and CM’s Alleged Concealment
AAP chief Anurag Dhandha disclosed that the CID had knowledgeable the Chief Minister concerning the violence ten days prior. Nonetheless, the House Minister claimed that neither the CID nor the police had offered any info. This discrepancy raises suspicions concerning the Chief Minister’s potential involvement within the occasions, necessitating a complete investigation.
Sufferer’s Dying and Criticism
Pradeep Sharma, the sufferer of the assault, succumbed to his accidents throughout therapy at Safdarjung Hospital in Delhi. The case was filed primarily based on a grievance by Bajrang Dal employee Pawan Kumar, who was current with Sharma within the automotive through the assault.
Kumar’s Account of the Incident
Kumar acknowledged that whereas they had been getting back from Nooh, Javed forcibly stopped their automobile round 10:30 PM on the evening of the incident. He claimed that on Javed’s orders, round 25 to 30 folks attacked them, leading to Sharma’s deadly harm. Gunshots had been additionally reportedly heard through the incident.
Gurugram Police’s Swift Motion
Gurugram Police Commissioner Ok. Ramachandran assured that the police took swift and robust motion to keep up regulation and order within the area after the latest incident in Nooh and different unlucky incidents of arson and violence in Gurugram. He emphasised that the police’s actions had been primarily based on the regulation and proof, together with arrests and detentions of suspects.
“`
