Taking a stringent view of the bulldozer motion sample being adopted by many states, the Supreme Court docket at the moment strongly criticized the observe of ‘bulldozer justice,’ elevating considerations in regards to the legality of demolishing a home solely as a result of it belongs to somebody accused or convicted in a prison case. Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, representing the petitioner, urged the courtroom to problem directives stopping the implementation of ‘bulldozer justice’ nationwide.
Talking earlier than the bench of Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Ok.V. Viswanathan, Solicitor Normal of India Tushar Mehta argued that no immovable property could be demolished just because the proprietor is concerned in a prison offense.
It is a creating story.
