The Union Public Service Fee (UPSC) has cancelled the collection of Puja Khedkar as a trainee IAS officer. Moreover, Khedkar has been completely barred from taking any future UPSC exams after being discovered responsible of identification fraud.
The us has formally said that Puja Khedkar violated the Civil Providers Examination (CSE) guidelines by falsely availing extra makes an attempt than permitted. In keeping with the fee, a Present Trigger Discover (SCN) was issued to Khedkar on July 18, 2024, for her fraudulent actions. She was discovered to have faked her identification to avoid the try limits set by the examination guidelines.
Failure To Reply to Present Trigger Discover
The 34-year-old was initially given till July 25 to answer the SCN however requested an extension till August 4. The us granted an extension till July 30, emphasizing that this might be her last alternative to current a proof. Regardless of this extension, Khedkar did not submit any response throughout the prescribed time.
Upon cautious examination of the obtainable data, the united states decided that Khedkar had certainly violated the CSE-2022 guidelines. In consequence, her provisional candidature for the CSE-2022 was cancelled, and he or she has been completely debarred from all future UPSC examinations and alternatives.
Examination of Previous Candidates
Within the aftermath of this incident, the united states performed a radical evaluation of information from over 15,000 candidates who cleared the IAS screening course of between 2009 and 2023. This in depth investigation revealed that, aside from Khedkar, no different candidate had exceeded the permissible variety of makes an attempt underneath the CSE guidelines.
The us acknowledged that Khedkar’s case slipped via their Customary Working Procedures (SOP) because of her altering not solely her identify but additionally her mother and father’ names. In response, the united states is working to additional strengthen its SOPs to stop such incidents sooner or later.
The us clarified that it performs solely a preliminary scrutiny of the candidates’ certificates, usually accepting them as real if issued by a reliable authority. The fee highlighted that it lacks the mandate and assets to confirm the authenticity of hundreds of certificates submitted yearly. The scrutiny and verification of certificates’ genuineness are usually carried out by the mandated authorities.
