The ruling coalition MPs have been up towards the Opposition Member of Parliament after Union Minister of Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju moved the Waqf (Modification) Invoice, 2024 within the Lok Sabha. Members of DMK, Congress and Samajwadi Social gathering termed it an assault on the federal system and structure, whereas the BJP and its allies defended the transfer. Congress stated that regardless of being Hindus, they respect the opposite faith. Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi termed it an assault on Muslims whereas the NDA allies together with the JDU defended the Invoice saying that it is aimed toward bringing transparency.
Opposition Protests
Congress MP KC Venugopal stated, “…We’re Hindus however on the identical time, we respect the religion of different religions. This invoice is specialised for the Maharashtra, Haryana elections. You don’t perceive that final time the individuals of India clearly taught you a lesson. That is an assault on the federal system…This invoice is a basic assault on the Structure…By way of this invoice, they’re placing a provision that non-Muslims even be members of the Waqf governing council. It’s a direct assault on freedom of faith…Subsequent you’ll go for Christians, then Jains…Individuals of India won’t purchase this sort of divisive politics now.”
Opposing the Waqf (Modification) Invoice, 2024 in Lok Sabha, DMK MP Kanimozhi stated, “It’s a direct violation of Article 30 which offers with minorities to manage their establishments. This invoice targets a specific spiritual group.” She requested whether or not the federal government will enable Muslims to be part of the Hindu temple’s governing our bodies.
Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi stated that the invoice is a proof that the NDA authorities is anti-Muslim. “This invoice violates the ideas of Articles 14, 15 and 25 of the Structure. This invoice is each discriminatory and arbitrary…By bringing this invoice, you (the Central govt) are doing the work of dividing the nation not uniting it. This invoice is an proof of the truth that you’re an enemy of the Muslims,” he stated.
#WATCH | On Waqf (Modification) Invoice, 2024, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi says, “This invoice violates the ideas of Articles 14, 15 and 25 of the Structure. This invoice is each discriminatory and arbitrary…By bringing this invoice, you (the Central govt) are doing the work of… pic.twitter.com/kehmLjV3Gv
— ANI (@ANI) August 8, 2024
RSP MP NK Premachandran in Lok Sabha stated, “You (The federal government) are completely disempowering the Waqf Board and the Waqf council…You might be dismantling the system. It’s towards the ideas of the Structure.”
NCP-SCP MP Supriya Sule urged the federal government to both withdraw this invoice utterly or ship it to a standing committee.
Authorities Defends Transfer
Defending Waqf (Modification) Invoice, 2024 , Minister of Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju stated, “With this invoice, there is no such thing as a interference within the freedom of any spiritual physique….Overlook about taking anybody’s rights, this invoice has been introduced to present rights to those that by no means acquired them….”
#WATCH | Defending Waqf (Modification) Invoice, 2024 , Minister of Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju says, “With this invoice, there is no such thing as a interference within the freedom of any spiritual physique….Overlook about taking anybody’s rights, this invoice has been introduced to present rights to those that by no means acquired… pic.twitter.com/cnn10PzwhT
— ANI (@ANI) August 8, 2024
BJP ally and JD(U) MP & Union Minister Rajeev Ranjan rejected the allegation that the Invoice is towards Muslims. He stated, “How is it towards Muslims? This legislation is being made to deliver transparency…The opposition is evaluating it with temples, they’re diverting from the principle difficulty….KC Venugopal (Congress) ought to clarify how 1000’s of Sikhs have been killed…which taxi driver killed Indira Gandhi? Now, they’re speaking about minorities.”
BJP MP Hema Malini stated, “…The opposition at all times opposes, that is their work. They label good issues as dangerous. The PM has introduced many good schemes however they are saying that each one these items are mistaken. I’ve additionally seen it from the final 10 years.”
